QueryProxy vs Bytebase
Both put a review in front of production SQL. Bytebase is a database DevOps platform built around schema change; QueryProxy approves ad-hoc queries.
Read the comparison
QueryProxy comparisons
Each page covers a single alternative, and says plainly where that alternative is the better choice.
QueryProxy vs Teleport
Teleport controls who reaches your infrastructure; QueryProxy controls what they run once there. Different halves of the problem, often used together.
Read the comparison
QueryProxy vs CloudBeaver
CloudBeaver is a web-based database client for working with data. QueryProxy is the approval workflow that decides whether a query runs at all.
Read the comparison
QueryProxy vs a bastion host and shared credentials
The status quo at most companies is a jump box and a password in a vault. Here is exactly what that leaves uncovered, and what an approval portal changes.
Read the comparison
QueryProxy vs StrongDM
Looking for a StrongDM alternative? QueryProxy is a self-hosted approval portal for SQL only, not an access platform. Where each fits, and where it does not.
Read the comparison
QueryProxy vs Hoop.dev
Hoop.dev alternative? Both are open source and sit in front of databases. Hoop runs a sidecar that masks and guards; QueryProxy is a portal with a DBA queue.
Read the comparison
QueryProxy vs DBeaver and DataGrip
Is connecting DBeaver or DataGrip to production safe? Their production settings guard the client; QueryProxy reviews each statement before a DBA lets it run.
Read the comparison
QueryProxy vs AWS IAM database authentication
What RDS IAM database authentication does and does not cover. It replaces passwords with tokens; it does not review, approve or mask the statements that follow.
Read the comparison
QueryProxy vs just-in-time access and PAM tools
Just-in-time database access and PAM tools decide who gets access and for how long. QueryProxy decides whether each SQL statement may run. How they differ.
Read the comparison